A doodler is connecting neurological pathways with perviously disconnected pathways. A doodler is concentrating intently, sifting through information, conscious and otherwise, and – much more often than we realize – generating massive insights. (Brown, 11 pag.)
How might we test this? What if we engage with our curriculum to experience connecting disconnected pathways, to generate insights, to make thinking visible?
It is the relationship between the teacher, the student, and the content – not the qualities of any one of them by themselves – that determines the nature of instructional practice, and each corner of the instructional core has its own particular role and resources to bring to the instructional process. (City and Elmore, 22 pag.)
What if we make a small shift in our role and resources to bring multiple representations to our practice?
…, it is the change in the knowledge and skill that the teachers bring to the practice, the type of content to which students gain access, and the role that students play in their own learning that determine what students will know and be able to do. (City and Elmore, 24 pag.)
These learners need doodling in order to focus more acutely on what’s being said, and they demonstrate better recall when they’re allowed to doodle than when they’re not. (Brown, 21 pag.)
Just make a mark and see where it takes you. (Reynolds, n. pag.)
Brown, Sunni. The Doodle Revolution: Unlock the Power to Think Differently. New York: Portfolio/Penguin, 2014. Print.
City, Elizabeth A. Instructional Rounds in Education: A Network Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education, 2009. Print.
Reynolds, Peter. The Dot. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick, 2003. Print.
I totally agree that it’s the relationship between the teacher and the students that is the most important. What’s important is that the teacher chooses whatever method of instruction that will maximize the learning of the students..and as you know, this can change even within a class period.
LikeLike